If you are facing an issue in kazi mtaani registration, then you are not alone.
As we know Kazi Mtaani gave many young people in Kenya a chance to earn some income, especially during the COVID-19 period. But getting into the program hasn’t been smooth for everyone. While some managed to register without any trouble, others ran into problems right from the start.
The research done by the Women’s Economic Empowerment Hub at the University of Nairobi looked into this. It found that about 22% of applicants faced issues during the registration process.
Below are the most common problems they reported.
1. Difficulty Accessing the Chief’s Office
The biggest issue mentioned by 88.1% of those who had problems was trying to access the chief’s office. In some areas, the chief’s office was the main point where people could get help with registration or submit their details. But people either couldn’t reach the office, or it was too crowded, or they weren’t given any clear guidance. If someone didn’t know the right person or lacked connections, it became even harder.
2. Confusing Registration Process
Nearly 90% of those who had issues said they didn’t understand the registration steps. The process wasn’t always clear. Some didn’t know where to start, what details were needed, or how to complete the forms properly. If someone wasn’t good with online systems or lacked internet access, they were left out.
3. Delays and Long Waiting Times
More than half (50.8%) said the application process took too long. Whether it was waiting for feedback or approval, or just the time it took to get through the steps, many felt it was a slow process. Some even gave up halfway or missed their chance because of delays.
4. Too Few Slots Compared to Applicants
Another issue raised by many was the number of slots available. There were always more applicants than the number of jobs available. So even after applying, many were not selected. Some mentioned that this made the competition unfair, especially in areas with large youth populations.
5. Favoritism and Nepotism
Some people felt that unless you were known by the chief or a local leader, your name wouldn’t even be considered. They said favoritism was common. In some places, applicants were told directly or indirectly that they needed to pay bribes or know someone to get in. That made the process unfair, especially for women and youth from poorer backgrounds who didn’t have those connections.
6. Last-Minute Changes in the Shortlist
A few also said their names had been accepted at first, but were later removed without explanation. These last-minute changes made people feel cheated. They believed that others were brought in later through the backdoor—again, often due to connections or bribery.
7. Limited Information Channels
Most people got info about the program through pamphlets, social media, posters, or word of mouth. But not everyone has access to those. Some didn’t hear about registration in time. Others got incomplete or outdated information, which led them to miss deadlines or fill out forms incorrectly.
These issues made it hard for qualified youth to get in, especially those without access to local leaders or internet. If the program is brought back or expanded, these are the areas that need to be fixed first. Making the process simple, open, and fair would help more people benefit—no matter where they live or who they know.
